Over the next few posts, I'll record some of my thoughts about the direction that Sony Imaging is taking, then we can determine the level of my prognosticative powers. To start with, some reflections on the designation of the new full frame cameras announced last week.
First, a quick recap of my understanding of Sony’s naming conventions.
A + 3 digits = DSLR;
A + 2 digits = DSLT;
A + 1 digit = full frame(?) mirror-less(?);
The higher the number, the higher the spec of the camera, with A9** being the top of any particular range.
Confusingly, the same number doesn't designate cameras at the same price point in different ranges. And I don't get why two very different cameras - the A7 and A7r - are given similar designations. And how are upgrades to be designated? With the three and two digit nomenclature, this was easy, but with a single digit you have to go to mark numbers, which would be a new departure for Sony.
Whatever, designating the new cameras as A7s leaves room in the range for a higher spec A9 - and an A9r? - model. What would that be like? A full frame, 48 mega-pixel mirror-less model, perhaps?
Whatever, designating the new cameras as A7s leaves room in the range for a higher spec A9 - and an A9r? - model. What would that be like? A full frame, 48 mega-pixel mirror-less model, perhaps?
Anyway, the image above is the final one from the last batch that I made prior to my Sigma lens breaking. Its another of a rose from our garden - I was experimenting with black backgrounds at this point, which I've get to return to.
No comments:
Post a Comment